In the second quarter of 2024 the gross domestic product was $3.31T MX, 1.62% more than the previous quarter.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, total gross production was $1.73B MX. The states with the highest total gross production were Ciudad de México ($1.12B MX) and Jalisco ($112M MX).
Economic activities are related if they require similar knowledge or inputs. In 2014 in Wholesale Trade Intermediation the states with the highest affinity were Sonora (0.81), Chihuahua (0.78), Nuevo León (0.76), Querétaro (0.73), and Coahuila de Zaragoza (0.71).
In the second quarter of 2024, Wholesale Trade recorded a gross domestic product of $3.31T MX, evidencing an increase of 1.62% compared to the previous quarter and an increase of 8.16% compared to the same period of the previous year.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, 207 economic units were totaled in Wholesale Trade Intermediation, highlighting Ciudad de México (53), Jalisco (19), and Estado de México (19).
Total gross production was $1.73B MX. The states with the highest total gross production were Ciudad de México ($1.12B MX) and Jalisco ($112M MX).
The visualization shows the number of economic units in Wholesale Trade Intermediation according to the number of employees.
According to DENUE data published in N/A, N/A companies with 0 to 10 employees were registered (equal number of companies as the previous period). In the same period, N/A companies with 11 to 50 employees were registered (equal number of companies as the previous period).
N/A companies with 51 to 100 employees were registered in N/A (equal number of companies as the previous period). Likewise, N/A companies with more than 101 employees were registered (equal number of companies as the previous period).
In the period January to June 2024, FDI from Wholesale Trade Intermediation was US$13.9M, distributed in inter-company debts (Confidential), equity Capital (Confidential), and reinvestment of earnings (US$0).
Since January 1999 to June 2024, the accumulated amount of FDI in Wholesale Trade Intermediation was US$299M, distributed in equity Capital (US$225M), reinvestment of earnings (US$46.7M), and inter-company debts (US$27.4M).
Period Jan-1999 to Jun-2024: US$161M, Mexico City is the main receiving state
No FDI is recorded in the period January to June, 2024
Historically (from January 1999 to June2024) the states that have received the highest FDI are Mexico City (US$161M), Jalisco (US$43.3M), and Coahuila de Zaragoza (US$21.1M).
Main investing country between Jan-1999 and Jun-2024: United States, US$102M
No FDI is recorded in the period January to June of 2024.
Historically (from January 1999 to June de 2024) the countries that contributed the most to FDI were United States (Confidential), Italy (Confidential), and China (Confidential).
The states with the highest degree of development opportunity in Wholesale Trade Intermediation according to Relatedness were Colima (0.62), Baja California Sur (0.61), and Tamaulipas (0.59). The Relatedness measures the distance between an industry and the current industrial composition in each state. The presented entities register a level of specialization lower than one unit (RCA <1).
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, the distribution of economic units according to size that had access to financing was N/A.
According to the age of the economic units, the distribution of those that obtained financing was N/A.
The states with the highest percentage of economic units that received financing were Chiapas (100%), Hidalgo (100%), Michoacán de Ocampo (50%), San Luis Potosí (33.3%), and Yucatán (33.3%).
The visualization shows the percentage of economic units according to size or age according to the sources of financing or the uses they gave to the financing received.
In the chart, each level corresponds to a size or age of the company depending on the option selected in the upper button. The darker the box, the higher the percentage of economic units that are in that category.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, the distribution of economic units that had a bank account was N/A.
The states with the highest percentage of economic units that had a bank account were Aguascalientes (100%), Baja California Sur (100%), Chiapas (100%), Chihuahua (100%), and Durango (100%).
The same information can be viewed for the economic units that had bank credit by changing the option selected in the upper button.
The visualization shows the percentage of economic units classified by size according to reasons for not having a bank account or credit.
In the chart, each level corresponds to a company size, the darker the box, the greater the percentage of economic units that are in that category. The categories represent the reasons why the companies did not have a bank account or credit, depending on the option selected in the upper button.
The visualization shows the distribution of purchases and sales over the Internet and the distribution of monetary transactions according to the medium used in the transaction and the size of the companies.
According to data from the 2019 Economic Census, internet sales reached N/A and purchases were N/A. On the other hand, sales made in monetary transactions were N/A and purchases reached N/A.
The chart shows the main problems faced by economic units. With the upper selector it is possible to analyze the problems affecting companies according to their size. By default, the problems of economic units with up to 10 people are shown.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, the main problems faced by the economic units of Wholesale Trade Intermediation with up to 10 workers are N/A.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, the distribution of economic units that had an accounting system was 84.5% units with up to 10 people, 100% units with 11 to 50 people, 92.3% units with 51 to 250 people, and 100% units with 251 and more people.
The states with the highest percentage of economic units that had an accounting system were Aguascalientes (100%), Baja California Sur (100%), Chiapas (100%), Chihuahua (100%), and Hidalgo (100%).
The chart shows the percentage of companies by size that used different mechanisms to control expenses and income in their operations.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, the main expenses and income control mechanisms were external accounting system (37.4%) in companies with up to 10 people, internally developed accounting system (44.7%) in companies with 11 to 50 people, internally developed accounting system (58.3%) in companies with 51 to 250 people, and internally developed accounting system (100%) in companies with 251 and more people.
The visualization shows the percentage distribution of the economic units in the Wholesale Trade Intermediation subsector according to the amount of income from the supply of goods and services.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, the states with the highest income from the supply of goods and services were list Ciudad de México ($1.16B MX),Jalisco ($111M MX),Estado de México ($108M MX),Nuevo León ($71M MX),Baja California ($55M MX).
With the upper selector it is possible to see the distribution of expenses for consumption of goods and services, in addition to the amounts of purchases or sales over the internet.
The visualizations shows the percentage distribution of the large economic units of the private and parastatal sector of Wholesale Trade Intermediation with innovation activities in at least one year between 2016 and 2018.
According to data from the Economic Census 2019, the states with the highest percentage of large economic units with innovation activities in 2016, 2017 or 2018 were Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave (25%), Querétaro (16.7%), Jalisco (14.3%), Nuevo León (10%), and Ciudad de México (8.11%).